Representative cases & matters

Commercial Arbitration

  • A biotechnology company in a complex ICC arbitration governed by Korean law arising out of a joint venture agreement with one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies.
  • A global development company on its potential LCIA claims arising out of a termination of an English law governed joint venture agreement with an UAE entity to build and operate an LNG pipeline in Pakistan.
  • A leading investment company in its defence of an LCIA arbitration claim brought by a high-net-worth individual relating to a corporate dispute with respect to a manufacturing group in Russia.
  • A global consulting firm on its potential UNCITRAL claims arising out of a New York law governed consultancy and management agreement with a leading airline company in East Africa.
  • A major aircraft operator on the impact of the U.S. and U.K. sanctions on the operator’s rights and remedies under English law governed aircraft lease agreements.
  • A consumer goods company in its LCIA arbitration arising out of a breach of warranties relating to an English law governed acquisition of a major pharmaceutical business in Russia.
  • A Danish energy company in two parallel SCC arbitrations brought by a contractor arising out of two contracts for the manufacture and installation of equipment for use in an oilfield in Kazakhstan.
  • A railways company in VIAC proceedings arising out of a suspension and subsequent termination of a complex railroad project in Libya against a consortium of Italian companies.
  • A joint venture in two related ICC arbitrations arising out of construction and maintenance of the submarine natural gas pipeline between Egypt and Israel.
  • An Italian manufacturer in a complex ICC arbitration relating to the supply of certain equipment for use in a brick production facility in Russia.
  • A Russian producer of snacks and confectionary products on its potential HKIAC claims arising out of a joint venture agreement with a PRC entity.

Investor-State Arbitration

  • A steel company on its potential investment treaty claims and interim relief against a CIS State relating to the seizure of an oil tanker due to an alleged breach of the sanctions regime.
  • A Canadian investor in its mining arbitration against the Republic of Kyrgyzstan brought under the Kyrgyz Foreign Investment Law relating to the revocation of licences for rare earth minerals.
  • A joint venture on its potential high-value Energy Charter Treaty claims against the Republic of Kazakhstan relating to the imposition of certain fiscal measures.
  • A CIS State in a dispute brought by a former subsidiary of an oil major under the Energy Charter Treaty and the UNCITRAL Rules relating to an alleged expropriation of certain inter-company loans and other breaches.
  • A CIS State in a dispute brought by a former subsidiary of an oil major under the Energy Charter Treaty and the UNCITRAL Rules relating to an alleged expropriation of certain shares and other breaches.
  • A Baltic State in an UNCITRAL arbitration concerning the alleged impairment of investor’s rights in a bank deposit following the State’s takeover of the bank.
  • A real estate conglomerate on its potential contract and treaty claims against an African state relating to interference in the sale of a stake in a development project.

Transnational and Arbitration-related Litigation

  • A pipes producer in its High Court litigation to restrain proceedings in UAE courts threatened in breach of a London-seated arbitration agreement governed by English law.
  • A leading energy company in its high-value High Court fraud litigation against several prominent Ukrainian businessmen, culminating in a twelve-week fully remote trial.

© 2024 Osadchiy Dispute Resolution. All Rights Reserved.